Newsletter
- Summer 2007
Inside This Issue
Version française
Newsletter
in PDF format (324 kB)
Version française
(323 kB)
Willows
and the Solvay beds in Syracuse
Cees van Oosten
SilviConsult Woody Crops Technology Inc.,
Nanaimo, BC
This field trip during the IPC Montreal meeting
in June 2007 took us to the Syracuse area of New York State where
we viewed the Solvay waste beds and the role willow can play in
solving a serious pollution problem.
What are Solvay waste beds?
The following description of the Solvay process
was borrowed from Wikipedia: “The Solvay process, also referred
to as the ammonia-soda process, has been the major industrial
process used in the production of soda ash (sodium carbonate)
for nearly 125 years”. “The ammonia-soda process was
developed into essentially its modern form by Ernest Solvay in
the 1860's. The ingredients for this process are readily available
and inexpensive: salt brine (from inland sources or from the sea)
and limestone (from mines)”
The area around Syracuse is rich in salt brine
and limestone and was the basis for an industrial operation making
soda ash from 1884 to 1986, using the Solvay process. It is used
in the manufacture of many products, such as glass, paper, fibreglass,
soap and medicines (among others). Every tonne of soda ash results
in about 10,000 liters of liquid waste, containing 0.9 tonnes
of CaCl2 and 0.45 tonnes of NaCl. This waste used to be dumped
in settling ponds covering approximately 600 hectares; these ponds
are 16-21 meters deep. Evaporation of water resulted in a chemical
‘solid pudding’-like substance with a pH 8 to 9.5
in the top layer and pH in excess of 11 lower down. When dried,
the settling ponds resemble Utah salt flats, but much smaller
in scale and certainly not as solid. The Solvay waste does not
contain any organic material and has no structure, which does
not favour plant growth.

Solvay wastebed near Syracuse (NY).
The waste products contain CaCl2 and NaCl and lead to
serious pollution of groundwater. Photo by Cees van Oosten.
|
Of the original 600 hectares of settling ponds,
222 hectares are still undeveloped and are considered hazardous
waste sites that continue to pollute groundwater running into
nearby streams and Onondaga Lake, which is one of the most
polluted lakes in the US. To mitigate the risk of leachate
reaching the groundwater, drains and ditches were installed
to intercept run-off. |
A novel way to combat stream and lake pollution
is to create an evapotranspiration surface that not only intercepts
precipitation for evaporation, but also has the ability to extract
water from the soil, preventing it from entering the groundwater.
Willow offers such potential as an evapotranspiration surface,
which is a cheaper and environmentally more benign alternative
to a geomembrane cap.
Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solvay_process
and field trip handouts
Willow – an effective evapotranspiration
surface
Willow and poplar (including aspen) are the first
woody species to establish naturally. The best species to deliver
a fast cover is the willow. It has high growth rates, high transpiration
rates and is tolerant of the harsh conditions of elevated levels
of chloride and pH. Although growth is relatively poor on the
Solvay waste bed soils, the willow survives and grows!
The key to success with willow is the selection
of clones with low water use efficiency; i.e. willows that are
water wasters and have a high transpiration rate. Willows also
need to have a large amount of canopy to increase interception
of precipitation in order to contribute to evaporation losses.
For instance an R-4 (or rising-4, meaning in the 4th growing season)
willow crop can have a leaf area index (LAI) of 5.
Due to the harshness of the Solvay waste bed soil,
biosolids are incorporated to enhance the success of the planted
shrub willows and any other weed vegetation that can also contribute
to evapotranspiration. Biosolids provide soil structure, nutrients
and improve water availability for the vegetation.
The first trial we visited was a waste bed amended
with biosolids in 2004 and subsequently planted with four willow
clones. This R-4 trial is where the researcher measures sapflow
rates of individual willow stems ranging from 10 to 25 cm in diameter.

Sapflow sensors on willow stems
measure sapflow, which can be correlated to water usage
and allows an estimate of water extraction from the soil.
Photo by Jaconette Mirck – SUNY.
|
The sapflow rates can be correlated to water
usage. For example, during the summer of 2006 maximum sapflow
rates for single stems were 4.1 litres per day in June for
one willow clone and 2.0 litres per day for another clone
in July. By using stem diameter distributions the total sapflow
per unit area can be calculated and thus total water use per
hectare. Research also discovered that late season transpiration
is significant and can have an important impact up to the
end of the growing season, which is well into October.
Sources – field trip handouts |
Cutting size – impact on biomass
The same trial contained a willow crop that was
harvested in 2006 as a 3-year old crop.
This trial determined the
impact on biomass production of various cutting lengths
(25 and 50 cm) for 10 willow clones. After two growing
seasons four of the clones planted with 50 cm long cuttings
produced biomass in excess of 20 oven dry tonnes (odt)
per hectare; three of the clones planted with 25 cm long
cuttings produced in excess of 15 odt per hectare. The
opportunity exists to utilize the periodic harvests as
a source of feedstock for various industrial end uses
such as power and heat generation or ethanol production.
|
An R-3 willow trial
on a 3-year old root system in the summer of 2006. This
crop was harvested last winter (2006-2007). Photo by Jaconette
Mirck – SUNY. |
Soil amendments
Growing willows on unamended soils of the Solvay
waste beds does not produce significant volumes of feedstock and
does not fulfill its role as an effective evapotranspiration surface.
The trees survive, but do not grow very well. To ensure good productivity,
the soils need to be amended with organic matter.
One trial showed the impact of seven different
organic amendment treatments and a control applied to two different
clones. The seven amendment treatments were various combinations
of three biosolids sources (Anheuser Busch biosolids, yard waste
and biosolids from a municipal waste water plant). The amendments
were applied in the summer and fall of 2005 and the site was planted
to two willow clones in May 2006, using 50 cm long cuttings. Each
clone/amendment combination was replicated four times. To control
weeds following planting, a combination of pre-emergent herbicides
was used. Survival after one season was generally very high, except
for amendments containing biosolids from the municipal waste water
plant. Aboveground biomass production varied significantly between
treatments and was clearly better than the control treatment.
The only exception was treatment with an amendment containing
biosolids from the municipal waste water plant. The possible reasons
for this anomaly could have been poor mixing with the soil or
insufficient breakdown prior to planting.
For additional sources of information, please refer
to the following websites:
• www.nyfederation.org/PDF2005/16Daley.pdf
• http://clu-in.org/phytoconf/proceedings/2005/6B_Daley.pdf
Top
Ontario-Quebec
Field Tour
Sabrina Morissette, ing.f.
Quebec Intensive Silviculture Network
professional
On July 11th, on both sides of the
Quebec-Ontario provincial border, there was a field tour to five
hybrid poplar plantations and one plantation of hybrid larch and
tamarack. The activity was organized jointly by the Quebec Intensive
Silviculture Network (le Réseau Ligniculture Québec
– http://www/unites.uqam.ca/rlq/), the NSERC-UQAT-UQAM Industrial
Chair in sustainable forest management (http://web2.uqat.ca/cafd/)
and the Forest Research Partnership (http://www.forestresearch.ca).
About 20 people participated, including representatives from the
Canadian Forest Service, industry and universities. The visits
aimed to show the growth potential of hybrid poplar in the heart
of the Clay-belt in Abitibi-Témiscamingue and north-east
Ontario, while offering opportunities for networking amongst those
interested in these types of plantation on both sides of the provincial
boundary.
| The day began on Ontario soil
with a visit to an experimental site established in 2002 at
Englehart on an agricultural site belonging to Grant Forest
Products. This private Northern Ontario company has specialized
in the production of oriented strandboard (OSB) since 1981.
The owners plan to look to growing poplars in order to reduce
supply costs. However, they want first to evaluate the profitability
of such culture in terms of anticipated yields. One of their
staff, Tammy Mazetti, for whom poplar growing is a hobby,
has been given the green light by the company to establish
an experimental hybrid poplar plantation. To do this, she
used 10 clones recommended in Ontario in a spacing trial and
a ground vegetation control trial with 5 replications. |

Englehart (ON) – Hybrid
poplar site trial of Grant Forest Products established
2002
Credit: Raëd Elferjani (Ph.D. candidate UQAT)
|
The participants then moved 40 km
south to visit a new site at New Liskeard started in May 2007.
The 3 ha experimental plot is on the ground of the University
of Guelph agricultural research station and was established by
the Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
(UQAT) and the New Liskeard Agricultural Research Station. This
represents the implementation of a new partnership between UQAT,
Guelph University and the Northern College. The director of the
research station, John Rowsell, briefly presented the history
of the trial and then invited participants to wander around. The
design includes three experimental blocks in which 18 clones have
been planted. In fact, since 10 clones were available only as
cuttings and in small numbers, these were planted in single rows
of 10 plants. As for the 8 bare-root clones, they were established
in single-clone blocks of 100 plants. In general, the establishment
appeared to have been successful, but the plantation, scarcely
2 months old, was showing signs of crown dieback and several cuttings
had not yet emerged from the soil. Annie DesRochers, scientist
responsible for the project, therefore reassured the participants
that plants with crown dieback would recover quickly enough following
pruning in year 2. In regard to the cuttings, Mr. Rowsell attributed
the slow growth to poor quality nursery stock. The growth and
mortality data which will be collected this fall remain to be
seen.
|
New Liskeard (ON)
- Participants at the New Liskeard Agricultural Research
Station
Credit: photo courtesy of Nancy Young (Forestry Research
Partnership) |
The participants then traveled to
the opposite shore of Lake Temiskaming to return to Quebec territory
and visit an experimental plot established in 2005 at Duhamel-Ouest.
Annie DesRochers, scientist responsible for the trial, showed
the very interested participants the results of adequate site
preparation, frequent mechanical cultivation and spot fertilization
since the plantation was established. She also explained that
the Duhamel-Ouest plot is part of a group of three related sites
arranged on a latitudinal gradient going as far as the Nord-du-Québec
region with the objective of measuring the effect of different
cultivation methods and evaluating the nutritional requirements
of hybrid poplar. The site visited is the most southerly, the
other two being located in the Teaching and Research Forest of
Lac Duparquet and the municipality of Val-Paradis. The different
cultivation methods are represented by three spacings (1m x 4m;
2m x 4m and 3m x 4m), and the nutritional requirements are determined
using four fertilizer indices. Another objective of the study
is to test the relationship between productivity and diversity
using monoclonal and polyclonal blocks. To do this, four clones
recommended for the region have been used and planted in single-clone
(one clone per plot) and multi-clone (four clones randomly distributed
throughout the block) blocks.

Duhamel-Ouest (QC) –
Hybrid poplar site trial established 2005 by Université
du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT)
Credit: photo courtesy of Nancy Young (Forestry Research
Partnership)
|

Angliers (QC) – Hybrid
poplar plantation established 2002 (UQAT)
Credit: Raëd Elferjani (Ph.D. candidate UQAT)
|
After a brief stop for lunch, the
trip continued to another site established in 2007 at Saint-Eugène-de-Guigues.
This time, hybrid larch and tamarack were the focus. After searching
to pick out the 750 seedlings newly planted amongst very strongly
competing ground vegetation, Annie DesRochers took the opportunity
to explain that this was a ‘good’ example of the importance
of good mechanical cultivation, particularly on an agricultural
site. In fact, it was clear that the site needed a first mechanical
cultivation which had been delayed for several reasons. Although
there was little to see, Ms DesRochers spoke of the study objective
which was to evaluate the productivity and adaptation of hybrid
larch in the Témiscamingue region, while comparing its
growth to that of the native tamarack.
The group then traveled to Angliers where they
were able to visit a trial of hybrid poplar, white spruce and
Norway spruce planted in 2002 on private land. Francine Tremblay,
the scientist responsible for the project, presented the trial
as well as the overall project of which it is a part. The Angliers
site is part of a 35 ha project involving four sites intended
to evaluate the productivity of different hybrid poplar clones
as well as several families of improved white spruce and Norway
spruce on sites with a good potential. This spring, the Norway
spruce suffered serious damage due to a late frost. The inventory
planned for this fall will show the survival rate and evaluate
the growth of trees in the trial. For hybrid poplar, the results
of the last remeasurement, done in 2005 showed the best performing
clone to be a BxM hybrid (Populus balsamifera × P. maximowiczii),
clone 915004.
Although the day had been pretty long, the curiosity
of the participants was still strong and the group finally reached
a site that had been optionally included in the schedule. The
Nedelec site, established in 2003, has the distinction of including
two different trials in a forest environment. To this point, all
the sites visited had been planted on agricultural land, so Annie
DesRochers showed the participants another alternative for planting
poplars – the forest. The 3.5 ha site included a trial related
to intra- and inter-specific competition, as well as a trial involving
fertilization and plantation maintenance. While walking in the
rain through these trials, the participants were able to listen
to Annie DesRochers explaining the objectives of the two experiments.
Eventually, the participants, a bit wet but with
heads filled with images of hybrid poplars in full growth, took
the road home, some to Ontario and others to Abitibi-Témiscamingue.
In the end, this field visit was declared an excellent opportunity
for exchange among neighbours, providing a glimpse of more short
or medium term interprovincial partnerships.
Top
Environmental
Applications of Poplar and Willow
Jim Richardson, Annie Desrochers,
Barb Thomas, Cees van Oosten
Introduction
Environmental applications of poplar
and willow involve making use of certain particular qualities
of those species to achieve specific environmental objectives
while the crop is growing. The qualities of poplars and willows
which are of particular interest include rapid growth, high nutrient
uptake, uptake and tolerance of heavy metals, ability to grow
in poor soil, rapidly developing and dense root structures, and
ability to take up large quantities of water or, alternatively,
to tolerate drought. Poplars and willows display these qualities
very strongly compared to most other tree species. Examples of
environmental applications of poplar and willow include buffer
zones or riparian planting, phytoremediation, geoengineering,
shelterbelts, urban and peri-urban forestry, bioenergy and others.
In June 2007 the International Poplar Commission
Working Party on Environmental Applications of Poplar and Willow
held a technical meeting in Montreal with field visits in the
Montreal area as well as in Syracuse, New York. This issue of
the Poplar Council of Canada Newsletter includes reports on the
technical content of the meeting and field visits. Preparation
of these reports was made possible by the contributions of members
of the PCC Executive who participated in the event – Annie
Desrochers, Jim Richardson, Barb Thomas and Cees van Oosten.
Background
The International Poplar Commission (IPC) is one
of the technical statutory bodies on forestry of FAO, the Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Its aim is
to promote the cultivation, conservation and utilization of members
of the family Salicaceae, which includes poplars and willows.
Established in 1947 with nine countries (including Canada), the
IPC now comprises 37 member countries including developing and
developed countries and countries with economies in transition.
The IPC has had an important role in the development of national
forest sectors, largely through the preparation of technical tools
and the exchange of ideas and breeding materials. It is the only
international forum that brings together managers, users and researchers
of poplars and willows to discuss topics of common interest in
a cross-disciplinary way.
The IPC carries out its mandate by supporting research
and management activities through six Working Parties dealing
with harvesting and utilization; diseases; insect pests; genetics,
conservation and improvement; production systems; and environmental
applications. These Working Parties explore issues of concern
to member countries.
The Environmental Applications Working Party is
the most recently-established one, having been first proposed
at the 21st Session of the IPC in Portland, Oregon in September
2000 and formally ratified at the 22nd Session in Chile in November
2004. It developed due to the high and rapidly expanding level
of interest in non-traditional systems of crop production involving
objectives other than timber or fibre production alone. This included
water quality protection by the use of riparian buffer zones,
phytoremediation of industrially contaminated land and treatment
of nutrient rich waste water.
The Working Party has met almost annually since
it was initially proposed, with events in the UK, Sweden, Chile,
Estonia, Northern Ireland and in 2007, for the first time in North
America, in Montreal. The meeting in Montreal was organized very
capably by Michel Labrecque, who is a scientist at the Institut
de recherche en biologie végétale (IRBV - Plant
Biology Research Institute).
IRBV, where the technical sessions took place,
is located at the Montreal Botanic Garden, where Michel is a botanist
and Head of Research and Scientific Development. Michel was assisted
in the organization by Ion Teodorescu and a team of graduate students
from the Université de Montréal with which IRBV
is affiliated.
The full-day technical session included 14 oral
presentations and a poster session with nine posters. Field visits
in the Montreal area included an experimental and demonstration
willow planting site on contaminated land in downtown Montreal,
‘living walls’ used as noise barriers in suburban
Laval and Boisbriand, and a 7 ha willow plantation and nursery
in the Municipality of Boisbriand. The group traveled by bus to
Syracuse, NY where field visits were organized by the State University
of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. These
visits included the Solvay wastebeds project where the use of
willow as an alternative ground cover is being studied, and the
Tully Genetics Field Station, the site of the most intensive willow
breeding and genetics program in North America, and the source
of much of the willow material being used elsewhere in North America.
On the return trip from Syracuse, a short stop was made to visit
willow plantations and clonal trials near Huntingdon, Quebec.
A total of 41 participants from eight different countries (in
Europe, North America and Australia) took part.
Scientific and Technical Presentations
With the current strong increase in interest
in bioenergy, short rotation culture of poplars and even more
of willows is taking advantage of one of the leading environmental
applications of these species. Two presentations described breeding
programs for willows for energy uses. Ian Shield described a willow
breeding program for the UK at Rothamsted Research near London,
a program that is part of the Biomass for Energy Genetic Improvement
Network (BEGIN) of the UK. The breeding program focuses on yield
improvement, but is also investigating resistance to insects and
diseases, and wood quality. Less than 0.1% of seedlings produced
end up as registered varieties, a process which takes up to 11
years from initial breeding to registration. Kim Cameron presented
the willow breeding program of the State University of New York
College of Environmental Science and Forestry at Syracuse where
a collection of over 300 Salix species is being used to develop
cultivars with improved field and rust
resistance. Yields of more than 22 t ha-1 have been produced.
Ryan Hangs described a new broad willow research
program at the University of Saskatchewan established in response
to the Saskatchewan government commitment to generate one-third
of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. The program
looks at clonal selection, cultural practices, environmental impact
on yield, diseases and pests, intercropping, greenhouse gas emissions,
biogeochemical cycling and the rhizosphere microbial community,
carbon sequestration, and developing a molecular fingerprint library.
The Estonian government is also promoting short rotation forestry
for bioenergy. Katrin Heinsoo of the University of Tallinn has
investigated biological factors and non-technical barriers affecting
short-rotation willow production in Estonia, the latter being
equally if not more limiting than the former. The main obstacles
are the inadequate supply of cuttings, lack of subsidies to establish
plantations, lack of expertise and harvesting equipment, and low
quality of planting stock. Cuttings often come out of storage
visibly damaged by pathogens (bacteria) which can be an important
limitation to willow plantations. Pajand Nejad of the Swedish
University of Agricultural Sciences spoke of his work on pathogenic
and ice nucleation active (INA) bacteria causing plant dieback
in energy forestry plantations in Sweden and Estonia with studies
ranging from assessment of the problem, through characterization
and identification of the causal organisms to potential solutions.
Bioenergy use may be only one of several environmental
applications of the same plantations. The BioReGen project in
north-east England, described by Richard Lord of the Clean Environment
Management Centre (CLEMANCE) of the University of Teesside, will
demonstrate the feasibility of reclaiming brownfield sites to
grow biomass energy crops at a commercial scale on a variety of
contaminated sites. The sites were contaminated with a mixture
of industrial and domestic waste materials. In Sweden, nitrogen-rich
municipal wastewater is being used to irrigate large-scale short-rotation
willow coppice energy plantations, with benefits of improved biomass
productivity and reduced nitrogen outflows, as reported by Ioannis
Dimitriou of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Alistair McCracken of the Agri-Food & Biosciences
Institute in Northern Ireland described results from the application
of wastewater from municipal wastewater treatment works to short-rotation
poplar and willow. The rate of application was about 200 kg ha-1
of nitrogen, but there was no indication that any nutrients or
metals were being washed into the ground water. The same author
also presented results of applying raw sewage sludge cake by soil
injection to growing crops of short-rotation willow. The lowest
application rate (37t ha-1) produced greater dry matter yield
than the control, but higher rates did not generally produce significantly
greater yield increases. Treatment of the sludge with lime or
cement dust may be necessary to kill pathogens and potential adverse
effects due to the high pH of this treatment on willow growth
will be monitored. In southern Quebec short-rotation poplar and
willow plantations have been proposed as a means of treating effluents
from aquaculture plants. Results from an early trial presented
by Werther Guidi of IRBV suggested the plantings were over-irrigated
with the effluent as shown by reduced biomass yield, but urea
fertilization might in some cases positively affect growth and
productivity.
Some of the most dramatic environmental benefits
of using poplars and willows have been achieved in reclamation
of industrial sites. Phytoremediation is the term used to describe
the clean up, enhancement and revegetation of such contaminated
sites with trees, shrubs or other vegetation. Jud Isebrands of
New London, Wisconsin, used poplars (cottonwoods, hybrid poplars
and aspen clones) on a former industrial site in Wisconsin contaminated
with lead and a suite of hazardous volatile organic compounds.
After two years, growth of several of the poplars was outstanding
and water table levels and hazardous chemical levels were decreased.
On the UK site described by Richard Lord, willow plantations gave
good uptake of zinc, fairly good uptake of cadmium and some uptake
of copper. While the zinc in the biomass could be considered a
fuel contaminant in energy use, this could be managed by blending
fuels. Angelo Massacci of the Istituto di Biologia Agro-Ambientale
e Forestale del CNR in Italy presented work on identification
of molecular functions and analytical descriptors involved in
heavy metal uptake and translocation by poplar and willow. Amongst
other findings, willow plants absorbed more cadmium per plant
than poplar but maintained more of it in foliage than in roots.
Andrej Pilipovic of the University of Novi Sad in Serbia investigated
the potential of different poplar clones in phytoextraction of
cadmium, nickel or lead. Highest concentrations of these elements
reduced biomass production in plants. Nickel concentration was
highest in foliage, lead in roots and cadmium in stems. In a pot
trial at the Montreal Botanic Garden, Rosalie Lefebvre of IRBV
looked at growth potential and heavy metal accumulation in poplar
and willow. Willows had higher concentrations of analyzed heavy
metals in foliage, stems and roots than poplars. Inoculation with
arbuscular mycorrhizae had no effect on biomass production or
heavy metal absorption.
Mauritz Ramstedt of the Swedish University of Agricultural
Sciences described one case where willows, of several different
clones, had a negative effect on the degradation of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil contaminated with creosote
and diesel fuel. He suggested this was due to interference of
root exudates from the willow plants which appeared to be a preferred
carbon source – over diesel - for micro-organisms responsible
for the degradation.
Jaconette Mirck of the State University of New
York College of Environmental Science and Forestry spoke of her
research on sap flow in three different willow varieties being
used to develop an evapotranspiration cover for the Solvay wastebeds
in the Syracuse, NY area. This work was featured in the field
visits following the technical session in Montreal and is described
in a separate article in this newsletter.
Willows used in riparian buffer plantings can provide
a number of different benefits, not all of which are environmental,
as shown by Julia Kuzovskina of the University of Connecticut.
As well as effectively trapping run-off from fertilized agricultural
fields, willow species with ornamental stems for winter-spring
harvest can provide off-season farm income from the sale of things
like living structures and mini-villages for children made from
brightly coloured willow whips. This could be an engaging crop
for youth, encouraging children’s involvement in learning
basic agricultural practices. Frederic Pitre of Université
Laval presented results of a molecular genetic study of the effect
of nitrogen supply on poplar root metabolism, which showed that
patterns of gene expression in roots of poplars are influenced
by nitrogen supply.
In the temperate zones of Europe, Populus nigra
and Populus alba have been very important components of natural
floodplain forests, but P. nigra in particular is in very serious
decline. Lorenzo Vietto of the Poplar Research Institute in Italy
presented information on conservation efforts for river forests,
including use of poplar and willow in riverbank restoration and
gene conservation undertaken through the EUFORGEN Program.
Poplar plantations can provide significant benefits in terms of
carbon sequestration. Terenzio Zenone of the University of Tuscia
Viterbo in Italy and the European Commission Climate Change Unit
reported on a major evaluation of carbon sequestration in traditional
and short rotation coppice poplar plantations, using eddy correlation
techniques to determine net ecosystem productivity in terms of
carbon stored by the ecosystem. Results indicated a very good
greenhouse gas balance for both types of plantation and different
intensities of cultural inputs.
In other presentations, Werther Guidi of Scuola
Superiore S. Anna in Pisa, Italy reported first-rotation results
of poplar and willow short-rotation coppice response to fertilization
in a lysimeter-based trial. Under fertilized conditions willow
performed better than poplar. Annie Desrochers of the Université
du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue spoke of the
problem of stem dieback on newly-planted bare-root hybrid poplar
in the Abitibi Region of Québec, where studies suggest
that fertilization in the nursery prevents the trees from hardening
before winter storage. Storage itself also seems to be a problem,
since trees over-wintered outside in trenches did not develop
stem dieback at planting, regardless of the fertilization regime.
Finally Michel Labrecque presented an overview of the work of
IRBV with willow for environmental applications in southern Quebec,
work which was effectively illustrated in the succeeding field
visits, described below.
Field Visits
Field visits associated with the meeting of the
IPC Environmental Applications Working Party in Montreal all focused
primarily on willows but in two widely separated regions –
the Montreal Region and the area of Syracuse in upstate New York.
1. Montreal Region visits
The first stop was at a brownfield restoration
site (Allée des Tanneries) next to the main Canadian National
Railway tracks and the Lachine Canal close to downtown Montreal.
Sediments extracted in dredging and enlarging the Canal at the
end of the 19th century and deposited on the site contained a
mixture of organic (mainly PAHs) and inorganic (copper, lead,
zinc and arsenic) compounds, but the site is not considered heavily
polluted. The first objective of the City of Montreal was to establish
a visual screen between a residential area and the railway. This
was created with two rows of poplar and willow plants in 2005.

The urban forest in downtown Montreal:
brownfield phytorestoration site (Allée des Tanneries)
next to the main Canadian National Railway tracks. Michel
Labrecque is addressing the participants. (Photo: Cees
van Oosten)
|

Brownfield phytorestoration site
in downtown Montreal: visual screen with two rows of poplars
and willows, planted in 2005. (Photo: Jim Richardson)
|
Subsequently, a small experiment was established
to compare the development and growth of willows and poplars on
the site and their capacity for phytoremediation of the inorganic
pollutants. Soil sampling was also undertaken. The work on this
site is supported by the Green Municipal Fund of the Federation
of Canadian Municipalities, and has attracted considerable interest
and participation from local residents who have established small
garden plots on the site.
Close to this site is the Experimental Station
of the Montreal Centre of Excellence in Brownfields Rehabilitation.
This non-profit corporation, founded jointly by the City of Montreal,
the Quebec government and the Federal government, provides interface
services for major landowners facing especially complex contamination
problems. It has supported a number of technology demonstration
projects, and the experimental station has facilities which demonstrate
innovative remediation solutions for contaminated sites. Phytoremediation
using willows and other plant species is a preferred solution
for the Centre.

‘Living wall’ along
Autoroute in Laval, Quebec. Willow whips used to surround
an earth-filled continuous ‘bag’ acting as
a noise barrier at a fraction of the cost of a concrete
barrier. (Photos: Barb Thomas)
|
The second stop featured
an environmental application of willow that has attracted
considerable public interest in the Montreal area. Adapting
German technology to local materials and conditions, the IRBV
has established a number of ‘living walls’ as
living noise barriers between suburban highways and residential
areas. These structures, which are almost 3 m high and 1 m
wide, have long willow cuttings (whips) planted very close
together along both sides of a barrier of soil. |
| About 30 whips
per metre are planted using three-year-old stems normally
3.2 m long. Drip irrigation helps establishment but is not
necessary for continued growth. The willows need to be trimmed
every year or two. Although the noise reduction is largely
produced by the soil at the centre of the barrier, the willows
create a much more aesthetically pleasing wall, and local
residents are normally very happy with the results. Authorities
responsible for providing noise reduction are also very pleased
with the cost, which at $350-600 per metre, is 10 times less
than using conventional materials. The future appearance and
survival of the ‘living walls’ remain to be seen.
Salt damage from the highway may be a problem, but the oldest
‘living walls’ in the Montreal area have now been
in place for five years and are still in good shape. |

|

Salix miyabeana (Asian willow species)
planted by city of Boisbriand, Quebec in 2006 and cut
back fall/winter 2006. Shoots are in their first growing
season on 2-year old root-systems. Municipal by-law forbids
herbicide use, so all weed control is mechanical with
a lot of manual weeding. (Photo: Cees van Oosten)
|
The final stop in the Montreal
area was at a 7 ha willow plantation established in partnership
with the Municipality of Boisbriand. This young, rapidly growing,
suburban community prides itself on its commitment to innovation
and environmental activity. The plantation has willows (Salix
viminalis and S. miyabeana) up to four years old planted on
agricultural fields surrounded by forest. |
The fields are ploughed one year before planting
the willows and sown with buckwheat which is subsequently ploughed
under. In the second year, buckwheat is planted again as a green
manure along with willow cuttings. The buckwheat between rows of
willow is removed by tractor and by hand within rows. A municipal
rule prevents chemical herbicide use, but fertilizer (26-13-13)
is used in 2 applications of 300 kg ha-1. The City of Boisbriand
plans to build a lab on the site in the next year or two, as well
as a cold storage unit which would be dug into the ground and have
a ‘green’ roof. Greenhouses are also planned, as well
as the construction of a maze within the plantations and connections
to municipal bike paths. In partnership with IRBV, as well as colleges
and technical schools, Boisbriand hopes to work on the methods for
‘living walls’ aiming to reduce costs and diversify
clones used and types of wall.
2. Syracuse area visits
There were two distinct focuses for the field visits
in the Syracuse area. One was the experimental trials of establishing
willows on the Solvay wastebeds, described by Jaconette Mirck
in the technical presentations in Montreal. That field visit is
reported elsewhere in this newsletter.
The other visit was to the Tully Genetics Field
Station of SUNY-ESF where field research on the genetic improvement
of shrub willow as a dedicated energy crop, for phytoremediation
and for other environmental applications was demonstrated. The
willow breeding program at SUNY-ESF was initiated in the mid-1990s.
Since then, more than 700 willow accessions representing over
20 species and hybrids have been assembled. Through breeding,
researchers have produced about 200 families from more than 575
attempted controlled pollinations. Two different replicated genetic
selection trials were visited. One, established in 2001 from individuals
selected in an earlier family screening trial, included 16 clones
from controlled crosses, four from natural stands and five reference
varieties. Based on first-rotation harvest after three growing
seasons, nine of the 16 clones produced through breeding produced
greater biomass than the reference clones S. dascyclados ‘SV1’.
A second trial established in 2002 included the top 15 individuals
from the top four families after two seasons of growth in the
first trial, as well as 22 other exceptional clones selected from
eight other families, for a total of 82 new clones with four reference
varieties. After the second two-year harvest rotation, the best
clone had produced 21.9 odt ha-1 yr-1. Efforts are now underway
to scale up production of the best clones for future trials.

Willow harvester developed by SUNY-ESF
at Tully Genetics Field Station, near Syracuse, NY. (Photo:
Jim Richardson)
|
3. Huntingdon area visit
| The field visits ended beautifully
with a stop at a willow and poplar clone bank in southwestern
Quebec. Established in 1999, the plantation includes a dozen
new willow and poplar clones provided for the most part by
SUNY-ESF. The site also includes a collection of 57 willow
clones from countries around the world donated by the Quebec
Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife. This field visit
was brief, however, since the group spent most of the afternoon
eating at the Domaine de la Templerie, a critically-appraised
Table Champêtre (country-style dining), where great
locally-produced meats and vegetables were enjoyed. |

Lunch at the ‘Domaine
de la Templerie’ in Huntingdon, Quebec.
From left to right: Drusilla Riddell-Black (UK), Annie
Desrochers (Canada), Katrin Heinsoo (Estonia), Robert
Langlois (Canada), Ryan Hangs (Canada), Lorenzo Vietto
(Italy), Pajand Nejad (Sweden), Scott Laidlaw (Australia),
Barb Thomas (Canada). (Photo: Cees van Oosten - empty
chair)
|
Business Meeting
The IPC Working Party on Environmental Applications
of Poplar and Willow held a short business meeting during the
workshop in Montreal. In the absence of Working Party chair, Kurth
Perttu of Sweden, the meeting was led by the vice-chair and technical
secretary of the Working Party, Jud Isebrands of the USA and Drusilla
Riddell-Black of the UK respectively. An overview of the history,
mission and scope of the Working Party was presented. The website
(www.fao.org/forestry/site/ipc/en) was considered to be a key
resource and members of the Working Party were asked to contribute
topic-specific case studies and relevant publications to be listed
on the site. The poplar and willow publication being coordinated
for FAO and IPC by Jim Richardson and Jud Isebrands was described.
This includes a chapter on environmental applications of poplars
and willows whose scope is similar to that of the Working Party.
Future meetings of the Working Party were discussed.
The preference was for low cost, small meetings offering good
opportunities for exchange of ideas and information. The next
meeting will be held in the fall of 2008 in conjunction with the
23rd Session of the IPC in Beijing, China. Thereafter, it was
suggested the Working Party might hold two meetings before the
24th Session of IPC. Nominations were invited for office bearers
of the Working Party to be elected in 2008 in Beijing.
For further information on the Montreal workshop
please contact Michel Labrecque (mlabrecque@jbmontreal.net).
For further information on the IPC Working Party on Environmental
Applications, visit its website at www.fao.org/forestry/site/ipc/en
or contact the chair, Kurth Perttu (kurth.perttu@vpe.slu.se).
Top
Visit
to Domtar operations, 15 June 2007
Cees van Oosten
SilviConsult Woody Crops Technology Inc.,
Nanaimo, BC
After attending the 10th North American
Agroforestry conference in Quebec City in June 2007, a small group,
consisting of Robin Woodward, Al Jurgens, Joanne Kowalski, Doug
Currie, Jeremy Karwandy (all of the Saskatchewan Forest Centre)
and Cees van Oosten (SilviConsult Inc. in B.C.), visited the forest
operations of Domtar Inc. in Windsor (Quebec). Éric Lapointe,
supervisor of silvicultural activities, and Raymond Vanier, superintendent
– Forestry, hosted an excellent field trip on Friday the
15th of June 2007.
The Domtar-Windsor mill produces hardwood Kraft
pulp for its fine paper production, utilizing the many hardwood
species harvested on private and public lands in Quebec, New Brunswick
and the US Northeast, augmented with residual chips from sawmills.
Species include various maple and other hardwood species, yellow
and white birch and poplar, including aspen. The paper mill uses
a small proportion of softwood KRAFT (NBSK-northern bleached softwood
KRAFT) with its longer fibre length to provide strength to the
paper and produces ‘Domtar Windsor’ offset paper and
‘Domtar Copy’ photocopy paper. The first mill was
originally built in 1859 and had been modernized several times
until 1985 when a new modern mill was built on a larger site.
Domtar’s private woodlands comprise approximately
200,000 hectares and are certified under the Forest Stewardship
Council (FSC). Silviculture operations include establishing and
managing short rotation hybrid poplar crops on approximately 5%
of the private forestland that is deemed suitable for hybrid poplar.
These crops are growing on a planned 12-15 year rotation. Hybrid
poplar KRAFT pulp has a longer fibre length than the traditionally
used hardwoods and is easier to bleach. An important challenge
for the future is to increase the hybrid poplar wood density for
pulp production through advanced selection and breeding programs.
Quebec has a long and successful history in developing
hybrid poplar programs and has had a breeding program for many
years run by the Ministry of Natural Resources (Ministère
des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune - MRNF). Many new hybrids
have been created that were tested for resistance to various diseases,
including Septoria stem canker (Septoria musiva). Hybrid poplar
planting stock is grown at Government nurseries and is distributed
to various landowners who manage their private lands under a management
plan.

Poplar stock produced at a government
nursery in Quebec. Roots get trimmed back to ease planting
(photo: Cees van Oosten).
|

Trial site located on farmland
near the Windsor mill. This trial shows two different
clones in their 10th growing season (called R-10 or rising-10).Clone
NM6 on the left and clone DN3570 on the right. Note the
difference in favour of clone NM6 (photo: Cees van Oosten).
|
Forest companies like Domtar contribute to a provincial
forest fund that pays for the stock; small landowners can get
the trees for free, as long as their land is managed under an
approved management plan.
Some rising-10 (R-10: in their 10th growing season)
trials established and maintained through the MRNF near the Domtar
mill are located on farmland and show very promising growth.
Very few poplar growers contemplate establishing
poplar plantations on private farmland. One of the main reasons
is that transfer of farmland to tree crops is regulated in Quebec
and the practice is strongly discouraged; agricultural land is
protected for crops through the ‘Loi sur la protection du
territoire et des activités agricoles, ou zonage agricole’.
Authorization from the department of Agriculture for planting
trees is difficult to obtain, all the more so since there is an
increased demand for land by hog farms to safely dispose of hog
manure. Quebec regulations currently discourage disposal on treed
land (or forestland) of mill sludges, various biosolids, manures
and effluents from various sources. In other regions of North
America this practice is actually increasingly encouraged and
hybrid poplar crops planted on farmland would lend themselves
very well to this practice due to the systematic layout that enable
manure spreaders, effluent tanks and irrigation equipment to be
incorporated in crop management. Growth of hybrid poplars is enhanced
by the addition of these products. Domtar is especially interested
in utilizing mill sludges as an organic supplement to the soils
in hybrid poplar crops and is conducting trials to collect data
that could eventually convince the regulatory authorities to allow
such practice. Currently the mill sludge is buried in landfills.
| Since establishing hybrid poplar on farmland
is regulated and strongly discouraged, Domtar has been establishing
hybrid poplar crops on a portion of its private forestland.
Outright clearing of forestland to create farmland for poplars
is cost-prohibitive. Instead the company has been using intensive
site preparation methods to establish this short-rotation
crop. For smaller parcels, a medium-sized excavator is used
to create approximately 1,000 plantable spots per hectare.
|

A new crop of hybrid poplar in
its 2nd growing season (called R-2 or rising-2).The stock
was planted in 2005 with rooted sets as shown in photo
1 (photo: Cees van Oosten).
|
This has been a proven method for Scott Paper Limited
for several years in British Columbia and Domtar is now also using
this successfully. To take advantage of the site preparation,
large rooted sets are planted to 30-40 cm depth. To start the
crop off, 250 grams of chemical fertilizer is placed in the rootzone
with a planting shovel. Various fertilizer formulations have been
tested. This is also a practice used by Scott Paper Limited in
B.C. with good success. Domtar is contemplating testing unrooted
whips of a similar size in an effort to reduce costs. The success
of unrooted whips depends on the clone used, the available soil
moisture and soil temperature at time of planting. The site preparation
method used here accomplished several objectives: ease of planting
large stock, increased soil volume for the tree roots, increased
soil temperature in the spring, improved drainage and effective
weed control for the first two growing seasons.

Site preparation using the ‘Lazure’
plough, pulled by a D-8 Cat. This crop of hybrid poplar
was planted in 2007 with large rooted sets as shown in
photo 1 (photo: Cees van Oosten).
|
On larger blocks a more cost
effective site preparation method is used with the ‘Lazure’
plough, pulled by a D-8 Cat. This combination creates continuous
plant rows with the same benefits the excavator method accomplishes.
The success of this method, although looking
promising now, will have to be carefully monitored during
the rotation. |
Our last visit was to a research trial established
to assess the effect of improved drainage on a cleared forest
site near the mill. The impact of ditch spacing at various intervals
on drainage and growth performance is monitored, as well as various
levels of liming and fertilization. Preliminary results indicate
that trees placed closest to the ditches show improved growth
after the first two growing seasons. The test is done with three
different clones.
We thank Éric and Raymond for a very interesting
day and wish the company every success in its efforts to manage
hybrid poplar.
Top
Herbicides
for poplar and willow
Cees van Oosten
Président, Groupe de travail sur
les herbicides, Conseil du peuplier du Canada
The Herbicide Working Group (HWG)
of the Poplar Council of Canada (PCC) has been hard at work for
its members to obtain minor use registrations for the use of registered
herbicides in short-rotation-intensive-culture (SRIC) poplar crops
in Canada. For an update on the year’s activities (2006-2007)
please view the report on this site (click
here)
Herbicides currently registered
for poplar and willow
Currently there are 13 herbicides
registered for poplar; five have the active ingredient (a.i.)
glyphosate and can either be used in site preparation or in a
shielded application to control actively growing weeds in an actively
growing poplar or willow crop.
Table 1. Herbicides currently registered
for poplar and willow
Updated: 13 Aug 07
| PCP# |
Company |
Active ingredient |
Product Name |
Poplar application |
Willow application |
Herbicide type |
| 23545 |
Dow AgroSciences Canada Inc. |
Clopyralid |
Lontrel 360 |
SRIC |
Shelterbelt only |
Post-emergent |
| 12433 |
Chematura Canada Inc. |
Dichlobenil |
Casoron G-4 |
Plantation |
Plantation |
Pre-emergent |
| 21209 |
Syngenta Crop Protection Canada Inc. |
Fluazifop-P-Butyl |
Venture L |
Plantation |
Ornamental only |
Post-emergent |
| 19899 |
Monsanto Canada Inc. |
Glyphosate |
Vision Silvicultural |
Plantation |
Plantation |
Post-emergent |
| 26401 |
Cheminova Canada |
Glyphosate |
Forza Silvicultural |
Plantation |
Plantation |
Post-emergent |
| 26828 |
Cheminova Canada |
Glyphosate |
Cheminova Glyphosate |
Plantation |
Plantation |
Post-emergent |
| 26884 |
Dow AgroSciences Canada Inc. |
Glyphosate |
Vantage Forestry |
Plantation |
Plantation |
Post-emergent |
| 27736 |
Monsanto Canada Inc. |
Glyphosate |
Vision Max Silvicultural |
Plantation |
Plantation |
Post-emergent |
| 25230 |
Jnited Phosphorus Inc. |
Napropamide |
Devrinol 10-G Selective Granular |
Nursery |
|
Pre-emergent |
| 25231 |
Jnited Phosphorus Inc. |
Napropamide |
Devrinol 50DF Selective Flowable |
Nursery |
|
Pre-emergent |
| 25297 |
Jnited Phosphorus Inc. |
Napropamide |
Devrinol 2-G Selective Granular |
Nursery |
|
Pre-emergent |
| 25728 |
Syngenta Crop Protection Canada Inc. |
S-Metolachlor |
Dual Magnum Agricultural |
Stoolbeds |
|
Pre- or post-emergent |
| 25729 |
Syngenta Crop Protection Canada Inc. |
S-Metolachlor |
Dual II Magnum Agricultural |
Stoolbeds |
|
Pre- or post-emergent |
All users are strongly urged to follow the
practices as listed on the product labels.
The author, the Herbicide Working Group and the Poplar Council of
Canada do not assume liability for crop losses, safety or environmental
hazards caused by the use of practices or products listed.
- Eight herbicides are registered for ‘poplar’
(plantations) or ‘SRIC poplar’ (crops). SRIC stands
for ‘short-rotation-intensive-culture’ and refers
to poplar (or willow) grown as agronomic crops on farmland.
- Five herbicides (a total of two active ingredients)
are registered for poplar nurseries (three) or stoolbeds (two).
The herbicides for stoolbeds are restricted for use from the
2nd year on only and may not be as useful.
- There are six herbicides registered for willow,
five of which are glyphosate herbicides.
The only pre-emergent herbicide currently registered
for poplar and willow (plantations) is Casoron G-4. The restriction
is that it be applied when trees are established for one year
(read one growing season) and must be applied to clean ground
to be effective. For that reason, it may not be as useful for
the poplar or willow crop grower; it is an expensive herbicide.
Herbicides approved for poplar pending final
label
In July 2007 the Pest Management Regulatory Agency
(PMRA) of Health Canada approved five new herbicides for SRIC
poplar (crops). The revised labels need to be filed and registered
with PMRA before these products can legally be used by SRIC poplar
crop growers.
Table 2 - Herbicides approved for poplar
pending final label
Updated: 13-Aug-07
| PCP# |
Company |
Active ingredient |
Product Name |
Poplar application |
Willow application |
Herbicide type |
| 25684 |
Nufarm Agriculture Inc. |
Amitrole |
Nufarm Amitrol 240 Liquid |
SRIC |
|
post-emergent |
| 27487 |
Monsanto Canada Inc. |
Glyphosate |
Roundup Weathermax with Transorb2 Technology
Liquid |
SRIC |
|
post-emergent |
| 27615 |
Dow AgroSciences Canada Inc. |
Glyphosate |
Vantage Plus Max |
SRIC |
|
post-emergent |
| 16279 |
E.I.Du Pont Canada Co. |
Linuron |
Lorox L Liquid |
SRIC - western Canada only |
|
pre- or post-emergent |
| 24835 |
BASF Canada Inc. |
Sethoxydim |
Poast Ultra Liquid Emulsifiable |
SRIC |
|
pre- or post-emergent |
All users are strongly urged to follow the
practices as listed on the product labels.
The author, the Herbicide Working Group and the Poplar Council of
Canada do not assume liability for crop losses, safety or environmental
hazards caused by the use of practices or products listed.
As of the 13th of August 2007, the revised labels
have yet to be filed with PMRA; this is expected to be complete
soon. To check, it would be best for the prospective user to access
the product search site of PMRA (www.pmra-arla.gc.ca/english/main/search-e.html)
by choosing ‘Option 2’, then select -- Select Field
-- and choose ‘Registration Number’ and enter the
PCP number that can be found in Table 2 (or 1 or 3) for the product
to start the search. This will yield the electronic label access.
**Note that one product, Lorox L, has the
restriction for use in Western Canada only. The reason for this
is that it is already registered for use in poplar in a shelterbelt
setting in ‘Western Canada’ only. Lorox L was approved
for SRIC poplar on the basis that its use be restricted to Western
Canada as well.
Herbicides applied for under URMULE
for poplar and/or willow
Two new herbicides were applied for under the URMULE
process (User Requested Minor Use Label Expansion) of PMRA.
Table 3 - Herbicides applied for under
URMULE for poplar and/or willow
Updated: 13-Aug-07
| PCP# |
Company |
Active ingredient |
Product Name |
Poplar application |
Willow application |
Herbicide type |
| 24913 |
Dow AgroSciences Canada Inc. |
Oxyfluorfen |
Goal 2XL Emulsifiable |
SRIC |
|
pre-emergent |
| - |
Valent U.S.A. Corporation |
Flumioxazin |
Flumioxazin 51% WDG |
SRIC |
|
pre- or post-emergent |
All users are strongly urged to follow the
practices as listed on the product labels.
The author, the Herbicide Working Group and the Poplar Council of
Canada do not assume liability for crop losses, safety or environmental
hazards caused by the use of practices or products listed.
The herbicide Goal 2XL
is a pre-emergent herbicide to be applied at or around the time
of planting. It is applied just before planting unrooted or rooted
dormant stock, or immediately after planting while the crop is
still dormant. It requires rain or irrigation to be activated.
It is a contact herbicide that prevents germination of weed seeds.
The herbicide does not control already established perennial weeds.
For the herbicide to be most effective, it needs to be applied
to clean ground that is free of debris, weeds and large soil clods.
The results of field trials completed in 2006 were
submitted to PMRA last March. An approval decision from PMRA is
not expected before the end of 2007. Hopefully the herbicide will
be available before the growing season in 2008.
This herbicide would also be effective in the management
of an SRIC willow crop. There have been no requests from any willow
growers to obtain a label expansion for willow. Should there be
interest among willow growers in light of the potential for SRIC
willow energy (biomass) crops, the Herbicide Working Group recommends
to wait with an URMULE process till the product is registered
for SRIC poplar.
The second herbicide Flumioxazin
is also a pre-emergent herbicide and is expected to act similarly
to Goal 2XL under similar conditions. It also has post-emergent
capabilities. Both uses were applied for in the URMULE and the
HWG requested that SRIC willow also be added to the proposed label.
The application will be submitted in the fall of 2007, pending
registration of the active ingredient in Canada.
Field trials are tentatively scheduled for the
spring of 2008 in Alberta, Saskatchewan (probably 2 trials) and
southern Ontario. The trials will be funded through Agriculture
and AgriFood Canada (AAFC) and will be managed through its Pest
Management Centre (PMC) in Ottawa. Only the poplar portion is
funded through AAFC. Willow was added to the proposed label only
after some enquiries from a willow researcher.
What about willow?
To date the HWG has concentrated on Populus
species (including poplars, aspens and various hybrids, collectively
called ‘poplar’) as the membership of the HWG mainly
consists of organizations involved with poplar. There have been
no requests from the willow community to have the HWG include
willow in its quest for new herbicides.
In order to justify adding willow to the HWG mandate,
it is important that new HWG members be added with the funding
to expand the mandate. The field trials and the URMULE process
come at a price. Two of the recent URMULES for Lontrel 360 and
Goal 2XL were made possible only as a result of field trials established
at and paid for by individual members of the HWG. A similar effort
is required for willow. If there is interest in seeing an expansion
of the HWG mandate to include willow, please contact Cees van
Oosten – Chair HWG at silviconsult@telus.net.
Top
Home
| Members | About
PCC | Contact PCC | Publications
| Links
Copyright © 2004 Poplar
Council of Canada
Last edit:
2008-05-20
|