Poplar Council of Canada
Publications:
Newsletters:
Newsletter - January 2001

You are hereYou are
here


 
Newsletter - January 2001

Inside This Issue


Chairman's Report 2000

John Doornbos

This is my fourth report to members of the Poplar Council of Canada. This has again been another busy year. We are now well settled into our new office at Canadian Forest Service in Edmonton. A number of activities have kept our Executive Secretary, Sandra Williams and Jim Richardson, our Technical Director very occupied.

Last year, Poplar Council worked with the Western Boreal Aspen Co-op to host our Annual Meeting in Edmonton in the latter part of August. The program included a series of excellent presentations and two very good field tours that highlighted a number of aspen and hybrid poplar breeding programs underway on the prairies.

This year, the Poplar Councils of Canada and the United States are co-hosting IPC 2000, the 21st Session of the International Poplar Commission, in Vancouver, Washington. This is the third time it has been held in North America with Canada hosting it twice previously. Jim is co-chair of the conference organizing committee; his colleague in this time consuming task is Jud Isebrands of the USFS. Jim is also involved in the associated book project and the Canadian tour of IPC 2000. As Jim explains in his report, our involvement in this prestigious event will help put North American poplar science and development on the world map.

Revenues from membership do not fully cover the cost of operations of the Poplar Council. Outside project work has always been required to sustain our activities. This year, we worked on two major conferences; Training to Work in the Forest as part of the First Nation Forestry Program and the Carbon Budget Conference in conjunction with IBFRA and CFS. Revenue from these projects has assisted us in balancing our budget this year and left a surplus available for next year. More details are provided in the Financial Report.

The outside project work has put us in a good financial position but, along with IPC 2000, has taken considerable time over the past year. With IPC 2000 and the outside projects behind us, we can get back to some of our other priorities including the proceedings of last year's Annual Meeting, the Council newsletter and the poplar scientists directory.

The Canadian Council of Forest Ministers recently announced Forest 20/20, a program designed to increase the conservation value of forests while ensuring the continued growth of the forest industry. While details are lacking, one potential new initiative of interest to the Council's members is a focus on high yield, fast growing plantations. This kind of initiative would likely include aspen and poplar hybrids and could also have an impact on our efforts to establish a Canadian poplar biotechnology co-operative.

I would like to thank Jim and Sandra for their commitment and hard work again this year. While it may not always be obvious to members, I certainly see and appreciate the effort put by them. I should also thank Canadian Forest Service for their ongoing support of the Council and its activities, including office support and their contribution to IPC 2000.

 

Top Top


 

Executive Secretary's Report 2000

Sandra J. Williams

Since our last Annual General Meeting at Edmonton, Alberta in August, 1999, the inside face of the Poplar Council Secretariat has changed considerably. While we are still located in the Canadian Forest Service Building, Northern Forestry Centre in Edmonton, we have also been granted the use of new office furniture and a new, networked computer from CFS. This has much to do with my part-time employment with CFS last winter. I split my work week between CFS and the PCC, with considerable overlap at times.

This overlap was in the form of two conferences. From January to April I managed the finances for the First Nation Forestry Program's "Learning to Work in the Forest", a national conference which took place in Winnipeg, Manitoba at the end of February, 2000. In May, 2000, I assisted with registration and managed the finances for the international conference "The Role of the Boreal Forest and Forestry in the Global Carbon Budget", which was held in Edmonton in early May, 2000.

Our involvement in the conferences allowed the Poplar Council to gain financial footage, as demonstrated in the 1999 and 2000 financial report. We are currently being audited by Revenue Canada for a large GST claim that we filed for the period April to June, 2000. The claim was large because of payments made in relation to the conferences. Revenue Canada has given us advice on how to adjust our claims and we shall have the situation resolved shortly.

Our membership numbers have remained about the same this year as the previous two years, but the numbers are down from five and ten years ago. I sent out membership dues notices in March and July, 2000. We are experiencing the same pattern as last year - members tend to pay on their own year. For example, if a member paid on July 25, 1999, the member will send in their 2000 dues near the end of July. Currently we have seventeen Corporate memberships with 54 affiliates as well as fifty eight individual memberships, of which four are new this year. Our individual members are opting more often for the three-year plan. I have received five membership renewals this year that had not been renewed since 1997. We have one student member and one associate member.

I thank John Doornbos for imparting his financial management and planning wisdom to me - this has been a great help in planning for Tour C and for the work we did on the conferences and general work throughout the year. I also thank Jim Richardson for all of his hard work and dedication to IPC 2000 and Tour C, which we have worked together on for the past several months.

 

Top Top


 

POPLAR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES AT THE PFRA SHELTERBELT CENTRE

Bill Schroeder and John Kort Investigations Section PFRA Shelterbelt Centre, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada Indian Head, Saskatchewan

Populus species and species hybrids have been widely used for both shelterbelt and amenity purposes in the agricultural region of Western Canada. Poplars have been extensively planted in farmstead shelterbelts because their generally fast growth provides quick wind protection for homes, barns and livestock. Since poplar was first distributed by the Shelterbelt Centre in 1909, over 20 million poplar have been planted by prairie farmers. Demand remains high with approximately 300,000 poplars planted by farmers annually. Interest in utilization of hybrid poplar for agroforestry, phytoremediation, short rotation woody crop plantations and riparian restoration has increased the emphasis placed of poplar research at the Shelterbelt Centre.

The Investigations Section of the Shelterbelt Centre conducts applied research in support of tree planting on the prairies. Poplar research and development is a major activity of this Section. The Section includes three Biologists and four technicians. Staff are involved in poplar research related to breeding and selection, pest management, weed control, nursery propagation, plantation design and establishment, carbon sequestration and water relations.

Since plantation poplar has only recently gained attention on the prairies, few plantations exist for research. A project was initiated in 1997 with cooperation from private landowners and wood-processing industries to establish 6 plantations of 6 ha each. The last plantings were in 1999. Each plantation included a clonal trial and a spacing trial. All plantations are in the boreal transition and aspen parkland ecoregions near the existing natural forests where they could be expected to thrive under rain-fed conditions. Other small plantations were established in southwestern Saskatchewan where supplemental moisture from groundwater or surface water was available.

A project to determine the suitability of prairie landscapes for hybrid poplar production is nearing completion. The objectives are to identify and map landscape areas that are potentially suitable for short rotation plantation culture of hybrid poplar. Preliminary results show that much of the aspen parkland and boreal transition regions of the prairies are suitable for poplar production on a commercial scale. The major limiting factors are precipitation and soil texture.

The poplar breeding program at the Shelterbelt Centre is designed to develop clones that are drought and cold hardy, pest resistant and fast growing with acceptable wood quality. To date the program has released four clones that are adapted to the prairies. These include two male, ('Assiniboine' and 'Manitou') and two female clones ('Walker' and 'CanAm'). A new female clone, 'Hill' is a putative hybrid of P. deltoides var. occidentalis that will be released in the near future. Hybrid poplars developed at the Shelterbelt Centre are consistently the top performing clones in evaluations throughout the prairies. Poplar breeding and selection continues to be a major activity at the Shelterbelt Centre. Over 200 new clones are being evaluated in plantations throughout Saskatchewan. A new breeding strategy that concentrates on development of hardy, fast-growing poplars for short rotation plantations, carbon sequestration, phytoremediation, riparian restoration and agroforestry plantings is being initiated.

The environmental and potential economic value of hybrid poplar on the Canadian prairies including their role as a carbon sink have prompted the Shelterelt Centre to begin studying drought adaptation of our best clones. Poplar growth is limited most by water in the prairies. At a given level of limitation of water, it is important to know how growth and biomass accumulation would be affected. A PhD project, currently underway at the Shelterbelt Centre is focusing on water limitation to the growth of the Populus deltoides putative hybrid "Walker" in Saskatchewan. An important aspect of this is the study of water use efficiency of mature Walker poplar.

Poplar has been studied across Saskatchewan by the Shelterbelt Centre for its role as a carbon sink. Poplar has great carbon-fixing capacity because it grows much faster than any other species. It is relatively easy to measure aboveground carbon in poplars, compared to soil organic matter or roots. The wood is close to 50% carbon on a dry weight basis and clonal propagation means that the biomass variability among trees is very small, compared to other tree stands. The results of the Shelterbelt Centre's studies and data from other sources on poplar growth have caused the National Climate Change Secretariat's Issue Table on Carbon Sinks to recommend a national goal of 50,000 ha of poplar plantation over a five-year period, 2001-2005 (see website: http://www.nccp.ca/html/tables/pdf/options/Sinks_OR-Sep-23-1999_en.pdf - page 9). Although not yet approved as government policy, it appears likely that the value of poplar plantations will be increased as their carbon-fixing value is recognized.

The Shelterbelt Centre looks forward to working with the Poplar Council of Canada, industry and other government agencies to realize the potential of hybrid poplar in the prairies. For further information on these and other projects related to poplar development in the prairies contact Bill Schroeder (schroederb@em.agr.ca) at the PFRA Shelterbelt Centre, Indian Head, Saskatchewan.

Top Top


 

1999 Financial Report

Sandra J. Williams for Dave Cheyne

Although the 1999 fiscal year resulted in a deficit of $6,501.04, the financial situation of the Poplar Council is positive. The 1999 loss is slightly higher than in 1998 because of the costs associated with moving the PCC Secretariat from Prince Albert to Edmonton and the development of the web site. However, the Council has maintained a healthy balance sheet of just over $90,000.00 for the 1999 year end.

The GIC reserves remain intact. When compared with membership revenues in 1999, the interest earned from the GICs constitute one third of our basic, typical yearly revenue. Revenue from memberships were constant at approximately $10,000.00 annually, the majority of which accrued from Corporate memberships.

From year to year, approximately forty per cent of our annual operating disbursements are administrative. Administrative costs include the services and travel of both the executive secretary and the technical director as well as accounting services.

Our contract work on several conferences in 2000 will offset the 1999 deficit and secure the PCC's financial situation for the next few years. The Council will continue to pursue contract work.

The PCC financial statement was prepared by Harris S. May in July, 1999. Mr. May judged the accounts to be in order. Information regarding the accounting statement is available to members by contacting the Secretariat.

Top Top


 

Technical Director's Report 2000

Jim Richardson

    Background

This is the fourth annual report to the Poplar Council membership from the Technical Director, a position that was created by the Executive Committee in April1997. The general objectives of the technical director are to supply technical services and advice to the Council, to promote awareness and support for the Council and to increase membership. The technical director:

a. takes the lead role on behalf of PCC in the development and co-ordination of the proposed Canadian Poplar Biotechnology and Genetics Association linking industry needs to research capabilities and pursuing research funding;

b. develops contract/partnership opportunities to raise the profile of PCC and promote the objectives of the PCC and, through fee-for-service work or contract administration fees, generate revenues for PCC;

c. responds to technical enquiries using E-mail, phone, fax and mail; contributes to the PCC Newsletter and participates in the PCC Annual meeting; and

d. provides services to members of a technical rather than purely administrative nature.

Recognizing the limited budget of the Council, these services are provided for a minimal level of compensation. As technical director, I work out of my home office, whose co-ordinates are given at the end of this report. I devote on average two days a week to Poplar Council business, but the actual time commitment varies greatly depending on the tasks at hand.

    IPC 2000

As suggested in my last report to the Council, the primary focus in the past year has been on the organization of the 21st Session of the International Poplar Commission (IPC) which is being jointly hosted by the US and Canada near Portland, Oregon September 24-30, 2000. Along with Jud Isebrands of the US Forest Service and the Poplar Council of the US, I have co-chaired the organizing committee for this major international event, referred to as IPC 2000. The IPC, which is a subsidiary body of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, meets only once every 4 years. Two IPC Sessions have been held in Canada, the last in 1984 in Ottawa. This the first time an IPC Session has been held in the USA.

The Poplar Councils of the US and Canada are co-hosts for IPC 2000. About 300 people are attending the Session, from most of the 36 member countries of the Commission. Financial support has been provided for participants from developing countries such as India, China and Argentina. The traditional focus of the IPC, throughout its 52-year history, has been on the breeding and culture of hybrid poplars, an activity that has been dominated by European scientists from Italy, France, Belgium and other countries, although the US and Canada have also been active in this work. However, we expect that IPC 2000 will open the eyes of the rest of the IPC world to the very significant role of the aspen resource of North America, its management and utilization. We can also be justifiably proud of our North American contributions to poplar biotechnology and genetic engineering, which are not widely known elsewhere.

IPC 2000 is an excellent opportunity to showcase our resources and progress in all aspects of poplars and willows. The program includes three days of technical sessions for the presentation of papers and posters related to the theme of "Poplar and willow culture: meeting the needs of society and the environment". Individual sessions focus on integration of new tools into long-term breeding strategies, phytoremediation and environmental policy, conservation of genetic and environmental resources, willow improvement and production, breeding for resistance, and world breeding and production perspectives. The five Working Parties of IPC are also holding their own sessions.

Field tours are an important part of any IPC Session. During the conference, all participants have the opportunity of a half-day visit to the industrial hybrid poplar plantations of the Fort James company. Following the Session, there are three separate field tours to: (A) the Columbia River area; (B) north from Portland to Seattle,; and (C) southern British Columbia and Alberta. Council members are active in hosting all portions of Tour C which exposes more than 40 international poplar experts to our successes and concerns with poplar and aspen in western Canada.

Another means being used to increase awareness of poplars on this continent is a book which is to be published in conjunction with IPC 2000. Entitled "Poplar Culture in North America", it contains two distinct parts. The first is a comprehensive guide to poplar growing and management in North America. This is essentially a complete revision and updating of a book produced by Don Dickmann of Michigan State University in 1983. The second part features succinct descriptions and illustrations of 50 or 60 of the most useful poplar clones and cultivars in North America. The book will be published by the National Research Council of Canada by the end of 2000 and a copy of the book will be sent to each participant in IPC 2000. Copies will also be available for general sale, as a joint project of the Poplar Councils of Canada and the US.

Another, specifically Poplar Council, publication has already been produced in relation to IPC 2000. Each time IPC meets, each member country is asked to prepare a comprehensive national report on activities related to poplar and willow during the period since the preceding Session. I was successful in securing funds from the Canadian Forest Service to enable the Council to contract with Cees van Oosten, one of our members, to prepare the Canadian national report for IPC 2000. In his work, Cees collected a great deal of valuable information from across the country. The resulting report will be a valuable source of data and information for all our members.

Work on the preparations for IPC 2000 has occupied a great deal of my time in 1999-00. I have been in almost daily contact with my US co-chair, as well as with the chair of the Scientific Committee for the Session (in Italy) and with the IPC Secretariat at FAO headquarters in Rome, as plans for the session developed. I am leading the Canadian tour, and am also responsible for coordinating the production of the book on "Poplar Culture in North America".

    Other activities

I have continued to develop and improve the Poplar Council website. The proceedings of the 1998 annual meeting held in Quebec have been made available through the website. A draft summary proceedings of the 1999 annual meeting held in Edmonton has been prepared, but not finalized. Membership information within the members-only section of the website has been revised and updated. News items and links to other interesting sites, including the IPC 2000 site, have been added. Reciprocal links have been made to our site from some of these other sites. Our website is well visited, with 3-4000 visits a month on average. We were perhaps lucky in having been able to secure a simple and easy to remember URL for our site (www.poplar.ca).

The website is undoubtedly the source of an ever-increasing number of technical enquiries we receive, most of which arrive and are dealt with by E-mail. When I am unable to provide the information the enquirers request myself, I involve other Council members who are experts in different fields. Whenever possible, advantage is taken of the opportunity to promote Council membership in responding to enquiries from non-members.

As a follow-up to the survey undertaken by the Council two years ago on interest in a possible Canadian poplar biotechnology co-operative, efforts have been made to establish a directory of Canadian poplar scientists. Progress with this has been slow, but it is likely that the directory will be set up as a subset of an effort of the Canadian Forest Service in Victoria to establish a directory of Canadian forest researchers. Discussions have also been held with the Canadian Forest Service Tree Biotechnology and Advanced Genetics Network to incorporate factual information about biotechnology and poplars in the Council's website.

    Future

For the first part of the coming year, winding up the affairs of IPC 2000 will be a primary focus for the technical director. This will include coordinating the final stages of preparation, publication and distribution of the book on "Poplar Culture in North America". Thereafter, I will have more time to devote to the direct business of the Council. This is likely to include the further development of the directory of Canadian poplar scientists and other aspects of work towards the promotion and co-ordination of a possible Canadian poplar biotechnology co-operative or partnership. I will also write material for the newsletter, maintain and add to the website and deal with technical enquiries.

Although my efforts this year have been focussed at the international level rather than within Canada, I hope that the Poplar Council of Canada, as one of the two co-hosts of IPC 2000, will be seen to have benefited from the experience. We have much to show to the wider poplar world and much to learn from people who work with poplars and willows in other countries. As co-chair of the Organizing Committee for IPC 2000, I am deeply grateful to the many members of the Poplar Council of Canada who have contributed in one way or another to the success of the event. In particular, I thank John Doornbos and the Council's Executive for allowing me to devote my time to IPC 2000. I also express sincere appreciation to the Council's Executive Secretary, Sandra Williams, who has also spent much of her time in the past year on IPC 2000, especially the detailed organization and planning for the Canadian tour. It is a great pleasure to work with Sandra.

Home | Members | About PCC | Contact PCC | Publications | Links

Copyright © 2004 Poplar Council of Canada

Last edit: 2004-10-27